Global Travel Media » Blog Archive » Singapore Airlines first quarter operating profit $39 Million

Home » Financial » Currently Reading:

Singapore Airlines first quarter operating profit $39 Million

August 1, 2014 Financial No Comments Email Email

The Group earned an operating profit of $39 million in the first quarter of the 2014-15 financial year, $43 million (-52.4%) lower than last year. 

Group revenue fell $158 million (-4.1%) to $3,682 million. Passenger revenue declined year-on-year on the back of weaker yields amid intense competition, and unforeseen events that depressed travel demand in some key Asian markets. In addition, other revenue fell in comparison with the first quarter of FY2013-14, when compensation (for changes in aircraft delivery schedules) in relation to prior financial years was recognised [see Note 2 below]. SIA Cargo recorded lower revenue, notwithstanding a 0.9% improvement in yield, as the airfreight market continued to be affected by excess capacity.

Group expenditure declined $115 million (-3.1%) to $3,643 million, as fuel and non-fuel costs dipped $68 million and $47 million, respectively.  Before hedging, fuel costs rose by $9 million, which was more than offset by a $77 million improvement in hedging result.

The Group revised the estimated useful lives of certain aircraft types to better reflect their economic useful lives with effect from 1 April 2014. The changes are in line with industry standards, and resulted in a reduction in depreciation expense of approximately $14 million for the current quarter.

After non-operating and exceptional items, Group net profit was $35 million, down $87 million (-71.3%) over the same period last year.

In addition to the weaker operating performance, results from associated and joint venture companies (-$27 million) also contributed to the decline in net profit. Share of losses of associated companies increased by $16 million from last year, of which $14 million was attributed to Tiger Airways Holdings Limited. The share of profits of joint venture companies reduced by $11 million, mainly contributed by weaker performance from the engine repair and overhaul centres. Exceptional items were also lower by $18 million [see Note 3 below].

The operating results of the main companies in the Group for the first quarter of the financial year were as follows:

1st Quarter 1st Quarter  
  FY2014-15 FY2013-14
Operating Profit/(Loss) $ million $ million
Parent Airline Company 45 89
SIA Engineering 21 28
SilkAir 2 14
SIA Cargo (18) (40)

The Parent Airline Company’s operating performance deteriorated by $44 million (-49.4%) as a $151 million revenue decline was partially offset by a $107 million reduction in expenditure. Revenue declined as yield fell by 1.8%, partially mitigated by a 0.4% increase in passenger carriage. With lower fuel costs after hedging and strict cost discipline, unit cost declined by 4.4% year-on-year.

SIA Engineering’s operating profit was lower by $7 million (-25.0%) as growth in revenue was insufficient to cover the increase in expenditure.

SilkAir’s operating profit declined $12 million (-85.7%) due to lower revenue stemming from weaker yields, coupled with higher operating expenses from capacity injection.

SIA Cargo’s operating performance improved by $22 million (+55.0%), as a result of ongoing efforts to better match capacity with demand.


The Parent Airline Company’s passenger carriage (in revenue passenger kilometres) rose marginally by 0.4% on the back of a 0.8% increase in capacity (in available seat-kilometres). As a result, passenger load factor decreased 0.3 percentage point to 77.7%.

SilkAir’s passenger carriage increased 2.6% year-on-year against a 2.8% growth in capacity. Consequently, passenger load factor was almost flat at 69.5%.

SIA Cargo’s load factor was marginally lower by 0.1 percentage point to 62.4% as carriage (in load tonne-kilometres) fell 3.5% on the back of a 3.4% capacity reduction.





During the April-June quarter, the Parent Airline Company took delivery of one Airbus A330-300 and removed one Boeing 777-200 in preparation for lease. As at 30 June 2014, the operating fleet of the Parent Airline Company comprised 103 passenger aircraft – 57 Boeing 777s, 27 A330-300s and 19 A380-800s, with an average age of 6 years and 11 months.


SilkAir took delivery of two Boeing 737-800 aircraft during the quarter and, as at 30 June 2014, its operating fleet comprised 26 aircraft – 16 Airbus A320-200s, six A319-100s and four 737-800s. During the April-June quarter, SilkAir launched services to Kalibo, Mandalay and Hangzhou, expanding its network to 48 destinations across 12 countries.

As at 30 June 2014, there was no change to Scoot’s fleet, which comprised six 777-200s. SIA Cargo operated a fleet of eight Boeing 747-400s after returning one freighter on expiry of its lease in May 2014.

The Parent Airline Company will continue to make adjustments to selected markets across the network during the Northern Summer season. A380 services to Shanghai were increased from five times weekly to daily, and Beijing will be served by daily A380 services from 1 August 2014. Singapore Airlines became the first airline to operate the A380 to India with the introduction of daily A380 flights to Mumbai and New Delhi from 31 May 2014. Athens will be served two times weekly between 9 June 2014 and 9 October 2014 to cater to peak summer demand in Europe.


The outlook for the air transportation industry has become more challenging with continuing uncertain global economic climate, geo-political concerns in the region and elevated fuel prices.

Load factors in the current quarter are expected to be stable year on year.  Aggressive fares and capacity injections from competitors will continue to place pressure on yields.

Overcapacity in the market will continue to impact the cargo business, notwithstanding a slow recovery in airfreight demand. SIA Cargo is targeting specific product segments and traffic lanes to boost performance.

In this difficult operating environment, the Group will continue to monitor demand trends closely and make appropriate adjustments to capacity deployment, alongside a continued focus on cost discipline.

Comment on this Article:

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Platinium Partnership


Elite Partnership Sponsors


Premier Partnership Sponsors


Official Media Event Partner


Global Travel media endorses the following travel publication