Home » Beverage »Headline News » Currently Reading:

Twice the price certainly doesn’t mean twice the wine

June 17, 2017 Beverage, Headline News No Comments Email Email

It’s a question I’m asked often enough to make it worth pondering. Is a wine that costs twice as much as another necessarily twice as good?

A couple wines that lobbed on my desk last week provided the near-perfect basis for such a comparison — two reds, both from the same winemaker, produced from the same area and from the same grape variety, but one priced at $30, the other at $18.

In the $30 corner stood the Chapel Hill 2015 McLaren Vale Shiraz. Its opponent, weighing in at $18, was the Chapel Hill 2016 The Parson Shiraz, also made by Michael Fragos from grapes grown at McLaren Vale.

The question, of course, is a trifle facetious. What basis do we have for making the comparison? Perhaps the only valid basis would be to score both wines on a system such as that often used by show judges.

Chapel Hill. McLaren Vale, South Australia.
Photo: John Krüger

This involves scoring each wine out of 20, with three points allocated to colour/appearance, seven to bouquet and ten to palate. A wine scoring 18.5 or better would be rated as a gold-medal wine, a score of 17 to 18.4 would be given a silver medal, while 15.5 to 16.9 would garner a bronze medal.

Hence an exceptionally strong class of wines may return quite a few gold medals, a weak class may be given none at all.

I’d probably rate the $30 wine at about 18 points, awarding it a high silver. To say that the $18 wine was only a little over half as good would mean scoring it about 11, but such a score would indicate a wine that was seriously so faulty that most consumers would probably choose not to put it in their mouths.

In fact, I’d probably score the cheaper wine at about 15-16 points.

So, the answer to the original question is a definite no. A wine that costs twice as much as another isn’t going to be twice as good, but it should definitely be better.

I remember something from high-school economics about the law of diminishing marginal returns. I think it may have some application here.

WINE REVIEWS

Chapel Hill 2015 McLaren Vale Shiraz ($30): A lovely, richly flavoured, mouth-filling dry red with a great depth of complex flavours.

Chapel Hill 2016 The Parson Shiraz ($18): A simpler, considerably less faceted wine without the same depth of flavour on the palate. Still a perfectly acceptable dry red though.

WINE OF THE WEEK

Deakin Estate 2016 Moscato ($10): An unashamedly commercial style with low alcohol (just 7 per cent) and plenty of residual sugar, showing light-bodied light-bodied but excellent fruity muscat flavour. Serve chilled.

Written by  John Rozentals

Comment on this Article:







Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Platinium Partnership

ADVERTISEMENTS

Elite Partnership Sponsors

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premier Partnership Sponsors

ADVERTISEMENTS

Official Media Event Partner

ADVERTISEMENTS

Global Travel media endorses the following travel publication

ADVERTISEMENTS

GLOBAL TRAVEL MEDIA VIDEOS