Global Travel Media » Blog Archive » Political Jargon Of The Year Awards, 2020

Home » Accolades » Currently Reading:

Political Jargon Of The Year Awards, 2020

July 3, 2020 Accolades No Comments Email Email


Polifiller, the automated political jargon removal tool, today announces its 2020 awards for the worst political jargon of the year.

The list represents the most frequently submitted pieces of jargon from editors, correspondents and members of the public worldwide. Now in its eighth year, Polifiller (polifiller.co.uk) is maintained by publicist Hamish Thompson.

Announcing the awards, Hamish Thompson said: “To those who ask, ‘why Polifiller’, I say: That’s a really great question! This is my message today. I’ve been very clear that we are at a crossroads and must let common sense prevail.  We need a better deal for people of this country.  A deal that is 110 percent focused, deals with facts, not fiction, and if you’ll just let me finish, we must double down on levelling up and send a strong signal that, in these unprecedented times, we need a world-beating package of measures to put it right and make our elected representatives’ messages very clear and simple.”

He added: “Mostly a Q & A with a politician is more of a ‘Q & Eh?’. There are plenty of exceptional politicians, but there are also many who tend to promise their way in and disappoint their way out.  The 2020 Polifiller list is a Bingo card for the audience.”

The 2020 Polifiller Hall of Shame

  1. “That’s a great question, [firstname]”

Judge’s comments: “Somewhere in the world in the last six months, a media trainer taught a politician to start an answer with this line.  Since then, it has spread like a global contagion. It is used in response to a tough question, the answering of which would torpedo the politician’s career.  It flatters the asker (or did, before it got annoying), so you buy a bit of goodwill.  It also creates a few valuable seconds of thinking time.  And beautifully, it is also an answer of sorts, which gives the politician the opportunity to go off and answer something completely different.”

  1. “We’ll have more to say about that”.

Judge’s comments: “This one is a standard get-out for “I have absolutely no idea.”  It has been a fixture at press briefings this year. It’s perfect, because it implies that they’re already on it and that they’re just about to announce something that deals with it.  Off camera, special advisors are already googling how to fix the problem.”

  1. “Ordinary citizens”.

Judge’s comments: “Unusually tone deaf.  I don’t believe that there are that many citizens that like the idea of being described as ordinary.”

  1. “Let me be clear”, “let me be crystal clear”, “let me make this absolutely clear”, “let me be absolutely open and honest.”

Judge’s comments: “This is a crystal-clear sign that they are about to be very unclear.”

  1. “I make no apologies for”

Judge’s comments: “This is the world’s highest horse.  It’s usually the prefix to something innocuous that they’re trying to make some political capital out of.  For instance “I make no apologies for campaigning for teeth being cleaned twice a day”.

  1. “Hard-working families”.

Judge’s comments: “This is one of those ‘down with the kids’ lines that rarely goes down as well as the politician thinks it will.  It’s a bit like hearing your grandparents talking about Snapchat or TikTok.  It’s an attempt to get onside with your constituents.  See also, ‘The Great British people’, ‘Aussie battler’, ‘doing it tough’, ‘Arctic Monkeys’, ‘I make model buses’, etc.”

  1. “Shoulder to shoulder”

Judge’s comments: “This is political code for ‘after you’.”

  1. “Unprecedented times”

Judge’s comments: “This is rapidly becoming an excuse, hotly pursued by requests for an answer.”

  1. “I was talking to someone in my constituency/electorate this week”

Judge’s comments: “An old ‘favourite’, though it is slightly past its use by date.  It usually elicits a pantomime, “Oh-no-you-didn’t” from the audience.”

  1. “Ramp up, double down, flatten the curve, drive down, level up”. 

Judge’s comments: “Political pilates for the pandemic.”

  1. “We’re all in this together.”  

Judge’s comments: “Superficially reassuring, but not true.  As the author Damian Barr pointed out recently, we’re all in the same storm, but we’re not in the same boat.  Some of us have dinghies, some of us have super yachts.”

  1. “Now is not the time”, “I’m not going to give a running commentary”.

Judge’s comments: “Slightly biblical variations on ‘There’s no way I’m going to answer that.”



Comment on this Article:







Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Platinium Partnership

ADVERTISEMENTS

Elite Partnership Sponsors

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premier Partnership Sponsors

ADVERTISEMENTS

Official Media Event Partner

ADVERTISEMENTS

Global travel media endorses the following travel Publication

ADVERTISEMENTS

GLOBAL TRAVEL MEDIA VIDEOS

ADVERTISEMENTS



%d bloggers like this:
%d bloggers like this:
sitemap